Monday, January 26, 2009

I, TOO, SIGNED UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

Yes, I signed the rebuttal to the lie-filled affidavit filed with the courthouse by Michael Pazzaneze. There's one problem for you, Mr. Pazzaneze. I told the truth. You should have consulted a lawyer who specializes in labor laws and not in criminal defense, although that IS a bit ironic.

I never received 50% of the base of ANY job, let alone almost 1100 jobs. I did not "come to you" in November, 2006, and ask to lease a vehicle from you so I could "drive" my clients. I never had clients. I merely have two friends who prefer me driving them and use whatever company I am working for. Did you think I wasn't smart enough to keep the emails where your dispatcher threatened to have other drivers drive my friends, and your response that I would always be the driver who drove my friends because that's what my friends wanted? You controlled who drove my friends, therefore, you were my EMPLOYER, however, since you are sticking with the lie that I was an Independent Contractor, this should be fun. Since one of my friends spent almost 45,000.00 and the other 6,000.00, DO THE MATH, because there are about 900 other jobs that you owe me 50% of the base on, as well as 100% of the gratuity. That's the agreement you swore under penalty of perjury that we had. When I left CTG, both my friends came with me. I do not receive 50% of the base of their base charges. If I were receiving 50% of the base of all jobs I did for you, I NEVER WOULD HAVE LEFT. You are so stupid, you can't figure out what any person with a half a brain will figure out. Did you even read what you signed? Did someone else sign it for you? Did someone else photocopy a copy of your signature like you did to me? The only thing I ever signed for you was an APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT. Imagine my surprise when I saw the same exact signature on my agreement to work as an Independent Contractor. The SAME EXACT SIGNATURE. You are so dumb, you didn't think anyone would hold those documents up to the light and see that they are exactly the same. The problem for you concerning those documents is that NO ONE SIGNS THEIR NAME THE SAME EXACT WAY TWICE. There is ALWAYS a slight difference, but not on these documents. You or one of your associates, photocopied my signature from the employment application and then pasted it to an Independent Operator agreement and photocopied that.

Dumb, dumb, dumb, and illegal. If you think a summary judgement will be granted to you based on your lies and my documentation that completely refutes those lies, you need a new advisor.

You can read all blog entries by clicking on the 2008 archive icon located on the right side of this page.

Friday, January 16, 2009

LATEST UPDATE

I was wrong. I actually did almost 1100 trips in a 14-month period.

Since Michael Pazzaneze of Chauffeured Transportation Group, or CTG, has decided to lie under penalty of perjury, it's all fair game now.

17 dollars per trip, plus gratuity. That's what MY pay sheets show. 17 bucks.....

Michael Pazzaneze has given a statement signed under penalty of perjury that he paid me 50% of the base of all trips, plus 100% of the gratuity. Imagine my DELIGHT at finding out that since he wants to continue calling me an Independent Operator and claims to have an agreement with me that shows I agreed to 50% of the base, he owes me about 30K, just in unpaid base fees alone.

Why, why, why would Michael Pazzaneze lie under penalty of perjury? Doesn't he know I am smart enough to have my pay sheets AND the emails detailing the cost breakdown of my jobs?

Some people in this industry are SO unethical, it isn't even funny.

Tuesday, December 9, 2008

Oh, Just Give The Lawyer The Documents, Already!

The "company", whose owner is a bigwig on the board of the New England Livery Association, has decided to take his time turning over all paperwork associated with the so-called Independent Contractor who is seeking overtime and back wages. Thus far, all they have revealed is the number of trips done in the time frame of approximately 13-months.

EIGHT HUNDRED AND TWENTY FOUR.

Does that include the ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY-THREE times you subbed-out the "Independent Contractor" to Boston Coach?

Just turn over the paperwork and do the right thing for a change. Turn over copies of the hand-written checks, the daily trips sheets, the Independent Contractor agreement...(the one with the forged signature), and everything else associated with this Chauffeur.

All you're doing by delaying this is opening up a giant can of worms with the Attorney General, IRS, and that Fortune 500 company. You know the company I'm referring to. The one with the employee out on disability and unable to work - but was able to work under the table for you for 9 years, receiving checks made out to her husband. Not to mention the rest of your under-the-table employees.

Do you REALLY want to go down this road?

Saturday, December 6, 2008

Wild Claims and Outright B.S.

In one case being discussed by lawyers in Massachusetts, a livery company has stated an Independent Contractor, who used the livery company's vehicles, phone, and GPS, was not able to work for any other company, received her work the night before, never signed a contract stating what she would receive per job, and also experienced many other violations of the Independent Contractor law, has been informed by the company's lawyer that since she often accompanied one of her clients (a client who would only ride with her, and has since followed her to a new company where she IS an employee) into retail stores to help her because she is 75-years old, she wasn't REALLY working!!

Excuse me, New England Livery Association BOARD MEMBER, but have you lost your mind?

The guidelines in the Fall 2008 New England Livery Association Newsletter which discuss differentiating between whether or not a Chauffeur is an employee or an Independent Contractor lists 10 rules one should follow. The President of the New England Livery Association violates EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM.

By the way, that former employee needs a 1099 from 2007, so she can file her taxes. Of course, in the course of filing those taxes, she will also receive a determination from the IRS that she wasn't an Independent Contractor, but an actual employee. Perhaps that is why you haven't sent that particular 1099 to the IRS.....

To GPS Or Not To GPS, That IS The Question:

Your "defense" that since the Independent Contractor went home on occasion during the 4 or 5 hour gap between jobs, she wasn't working is completely contradictory. You say you know this because she was GPS'd, however; you aren't supposed to GPS Independent Contractors per the New England Livery Association's Fall Newletter and the 3-prong state of Massachusetts rules. How can you use GPS as a defense that she wasn't an employee? That makes no sense whatsoever. Independent Contractors are supposed to be "FREE FROM CONTROL".

Get it yet? You will.

We're "LIVERY", We Don't Have To Pay Overtime!!!

This is the latest claim by one livery company in Massachusetts. Since they are LIVERY, they think they can put you in a car for 12 to 15 hours a day and only pay you for the jobs you do. So if you do 3 runs in a 12-hour period, you might make 90 dollars. Little do they realize, if you are in one of their cars, you are working!! This means they must pay you at least an hourly wage per hour.

And by the way? Some of you don't have DOT registration numbers displayed on the outside of your vehicles. You do realize that's a violation of the DOT, don't you? You want to fall under the overtime rules of the DOT, but you don't want to spend the time or money following the guidelines.

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

This Is So Funny, It's Sad

http://www.nelivery.org/about/codeOfEthics.cfm

WHAT ethics?

How many of these Board Members were involved in the lawsuit against Boston Coach for non-payment of tips? These affiliates knew what they should have paid their Chauffeurs, but instead, they pocketed the money.

Well, Isn't That Special!!!!

The New England Livery Association has come out with guidelines to help companies learn how to separate their Independent Operators from their actual employees, and to make sure these companies do not misclassify Independent Operators who are actually working as employees. This pamphlet was left for Chauffeurs to read at Logan Airport.

The real irony in all of this is the fact that a few of the chief players and board members of the New England Livery Association are the biggest violators of them all!!!

If you read the list of guidelines, they fail on every single issue.

There should be a class action lawsuit against these companies that fail to pay hourly wages, overtime, worker's compensation, state and federal taxes, and unemployment insurance.

One day soon, it might just happen.....

Stay tuned.